In short. Pigment change, a cold-sore outbreak, infection, a scar made worse by over-treatment, and the risk that a mark was treated before it was diagnosed.

Key points

  • The mechanism of this treatment is injury followed by repair, and repair takes time.
  • A course that shortens its intervals, adds passes, or treats the same area before it has finished responding is adding injury without adding recovery.
  • The result can be more scarring rather than less, and it is the risk the patient has the most power over, because the question to ask when a plan accelerates is what governs the interval.

The risks of this treatment are mostly the risks of controlled injury to the skin, plus a small number that belong to the way it is delivered. None of them makes the treatment dangerous in careful hands. What they make worth checking is the hands.

Pigment change, in either direction

Injured skin can heal darker or lighter than it was. Darkening is the more common of the two and is more likely in skin that has marked after previous injury, or after sun exposure in the weeks following a session. Lightening is less common and is associated with treatment that is too deep or too frequent. Both are reasons the assessment asks about your skin's history rather than its tone.

A cold-sore outbreak

Needling can trigger an outbreak in someone who carries the virus, and an outbreak on freshly treated skin is painful and a route to scarring. It is one of the most commonly missed questions at assessment, because patients who have not had an outbreak for years do not think of themselves as carrying anything. Say so. It is managed by asking in advance and sometimes by treatment around the session.

Infection and granuloma

Infection is uncommon and is associated with poor technique, a cartridge that was not sterile or was used more than once, and skin that was already inflamed before the session. A granuloma is a firm nodule the body forms around material it does not accept. It persists rather than settling, and it is assessed rather than treated over.

A scar made worse by over-treatment

The mechanism of this treatment is injury followed by repair, and repair takes time. A course that shortens its intervals, adds passes, or treats the same area before it has finished responding is adding injury without adding recovery. The result can be more scarring rather than less, and it is the risk the patient has the most power over, because the question to ask when a plan accelerates is what governs the interval. A good answer names the skin's healing; a poor one names the calendar.

Bruising, and the ordinary discomforts

Bruising occurs, particularly around the eyes and in patients on anything that affects clotting. Redness, warmth and tightness for a day or two are the expected response rather than complications. Flaking is the surface turning over. None of those needs anything done about it.

The risk that matters most

A mark that needed to be identified before it was treated. New, changing, bleeding or asymmetrical lesions are a diagnosis question, and needling over one delays the answer. An examination under magnification before treatment, and a referral when the finding is not clear, is the most important safety behaviour in this treatment.

Three findings to report rather than wait out

  • Spreading redness, increasing pain, fever or discharge from a treated area.
  • A colour change that is spreading or darkening rather than settling, or blistering rather than uniform redness.
  • A firm bump that persists, or a mark that changes after treatment rather than improving.

All of those are uncommon. All of them are easier to manage early, which is the whole reason to report them rather than give them another week.

Related reading

Frequently asked questions

How likely is pigment change?

It depends far more on your skin than on the treatment. Skin that has marked after previous injuries is the skin where it happens, and skin that has not usually continues not to. That is why the assessment asks about your history rather than your tone, and why a test area is a reasonable request before a full course in any skin whose behaviour is uncertain.

Can this treatment make scarring worse?

It can, and the usual cause is treating the same area too often or too deeply. A course that shortens its intervals to produce a faster result is adding injury without adding recovery time, and the outcome in the worst case is more scarring rather than less. This is the risk most under the patient's own control, because it is the one to ask about when a plan accelerates.

What is a granuloma?

A small nodule the body forms around material it does not accept. In this setting it is a reaction to something introduced through the channels, and it is uncommon. It presents as a firm bump that persists rather than settling, and it needs assessment rather than squeezing or further treatment over the top of it.

Risks & Limitations

  • Response varies between people and between areas of the same face, and the session count is decided as treatment continues.
  • Pigment change can occur in either direction, and the risk is higher in skin that darkens after injury.
  • A cold-sore outbreak, infection, bruising or a granuloma can occur, and poor technique or a reused cartridge raises the risk.
  • Treating the same area too often or too deeply can worsen texture rather than improve it. No result can be guaranteed.

When to Seek Care

  • Spreading redness, increasing pain, fever or discharge after a session — contact the treating team promptly.
  • Blistering, a burn-like reaction or a colour change that is spreading rather than settling.
  • A mark that is new, changing, bleeding or asymmetrical — assessed as a diagnosis before any treatment.
  • Difficulty breathing, chest pain, or a rapidly spreading skin infection — seek emergency care immediately.

References & Further Reading

  • American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) — procedure and safety guidance
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, UK) — relevant guidance
  • Cochrane Library — systematic reviews
  • Chinese Medical Association Plastic Surgery Branch — clinical guidance

Medically reviewed by Ke He, MD (何锞), Deputy Director & Head of Skin & Laser Aesthetics. Last reviewed: 19 September 2026.

This page is patient education, not medical advice, and it does not cite individual studies. Discuss your own case with a qualified clinician. To arrange an assessment at Chongqing West District Hospital, see Contact & Consultation.